On Sat, 20 May 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> UNDER <supertable>, <supertable>, ...
The standard is very confusing, I am probably wrong, but I didn't see the
syntax for allowing more than one <supertable clause> after the UNDER keyword.
Did Oracle approve ANSI-ISO-9075? I didn't notice them listed anywhere. 9075
is the SQL3 standard right? (or else I'm reading the wrong stuff!!) :)
--
Robert B. Easter
reaster@comptechnews.com