Re: Performance aggregates

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От snpe
Тема Re: Performance aggregates
Дата
Msg-id 01051521000204.01497@spnew
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Performance aggregates  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>)
Ответы Re: Performance aggregates  (Ryan Mahoney <ryan@paymentalliance.net>)
Список pgsql-general
On Tuesday 15 May 2001 17:28, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2001, snpe wrote:
> > Table e_kalkn have 4668 rows and e_kalkns 101170 rows.
> >
> > Query :
> >
> > select roba,sum(izn)
> >  from e_kalkn k,e_kalkns ks
> >  where k.id=ks.id
> >  group by roba
> >  order by roba
> >
> > is 2.5 times faster on one commercial database (there are tests on
> > Internet that say 'Postgresql is faster than that database).
> > I can't say which database it is.
>
> Have you run vacuum analyze (since loading the data) and what does explain
> show for the query.  Also, what version are you using?
>
version postgresql 7.1.1

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Gregory Wood"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Re: What's the best front end/client under MS Windows?
Следующее
От: snpe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance aggregates