Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Yury Zhuravlev
Тема Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
Дата
Msg-id 0118aa6a-fb25-4a65-93df-fb97520024cd@postgrespro.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE  (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I have a big question. What need to do with message protocol?
If we write name in Parse message we store prepared statement.
I see some solutions for this problem but all not ideal:
1. We can add second char token for parse message. But too serious change.
2. We can try add parameter to tail of message. But in tail we have
variable length array with parameters.
3. Detect prefix of prepared name. For example "__". Effects think clear.

I would like to know the community opinion on this matter.

Thanks.

--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP: Access method extendability