Re: duplicates

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Moray McConnachie
Тема Re: duplicates
Дата
Msg-id 012301bfa089$82ffa920$760e01a3@oucs.ox.ac.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на duplicates  (Allan Kelly <allan.kelly@buildstore.co.uk>)
Список pgsql-sql
----- Original Message -----
From: "Allan Kelly" <allan.kelly@buildstore.co.uk>
To: <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 11:34 AM
Subject: [SQL] duplicates


> I have a system bug which means that I have occasional dupicate entries in
> my 'subscribers' table. I'm trying to find a query which performs
something
> like a 'where user_name is not unique' query.
>
> At the moment we use this cludge:
>
> select count(*), user_name from subscribers
> group by user_name order by count;
>
> (I'm surprised I can't add 'where count > 1' but it seems conditionals on
> aggregate fields are not allowed).
>
> This gives me a very long list with the 'not unique' entries at the
bottom, eg
>
> count | user_name
> ------+------------------
> 1     | bill.hicks
>   [ ..cut 9 zillion results.. ]
> 1     | margaret.thatcher
> 4     | linus.torvalds
> 9     | bill.gates
>
> I then have to do
>
> select oid from subscribers where user_name = 'linus.torvalds';
>
> and delete all but one of the records. Is there a better way to do this?

DELETE FROM subscribers WHERE EXISTS(SELECT x.username FROM subscribers x
WHERE subscribers.oid
<x.oid AND subscribers.username LIKE x.username);

ought to do it, I *think*. It will delete all but the most recently inserted
copy, i.e. that with the highest oid. Self-joins (which this is,
effectively), are often quicker and more efficient than counts.

Yours,
Moray




В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Leonid P. Klemjatsionok"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re[2]: update only if single row
Следующее
От: Jan Varga
Дата:
Сообщение: subquery returnig more than one field