Re: partitioned table query question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vivek Khera
Тема Re: partitioned table query question
Дата
Msg-id 0178E1E7-9CB6-403F-A000-334AAA13327F@kcilink.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: partitioned table query question  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: partitioned table query question  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
On Dec 11, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Gregory Stark wrote:

> The problem Tom's tried to explain is that the function may or may not
> preserve the bin. So for example if you wanted to bin based on the
> final digit
> of a numeric number, so you had a constraint like

I, along with at least Erik, was thinking that the constraint
expression would be evaluated to determine whether to include the
partition in the final plan.  Based on Tom's description, it is not
the case: the planner basically proves that the constraint will be
false.  Until this was clarified, Tom's points totally confused the
heck out of me.

It would be amazingly wonderful if this distinction could be posted to
the online docs.  It will surely help future generations :-)


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: top posting (was: Hijack!)
Следующее
От: Richard Huxton
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: POSIX and libpq