Re: [HACKERS] Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is comingfor table which is already removed

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is comingfor table which is already removed
Дата
Msg-id 01b46645-b827-d3d3-6716-91f2111fbd93@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is comingfor table which is already removed  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 6/9/17 02:07, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 03:21:34PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 6/3/17 01:04, Noah Misch wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:15:50PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> On 5/30/17 13:25, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>>>> I think this cause is that the relation status entry could be deleted
>>>>> by ALTER SUBSCRIPTION REFRESH before corresponding table sync worker
>>>>> starting. Attached patch fixes issues reported on this thread so far.
>>>>
>>>> This looks like a reasonable change, but it conflicts with the change
>>>> discussed on "logical replication - still unstable after all these
>>>> months".  I think I'll deal with that one first.
>>>
>>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  You own
>>> this open item.  Please observe the policy on open item ownership and send a
>>> status update within three calendar days of this message.  Include a date for
>>> your subsequent status update.
>>
>> I'm working on this now and will report back tomorrow.
> 
> IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED.

Work is ongoing and progress is being made.  I will check back in on Monday.


-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is comingfor table which is already removed
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Notes on testing Postgres 10b1