Dave Page wrote:
Yeuch. Have we completely removed the 2.4 target now? How about the Mac port is non-Unicode only for now?
Regards, Dave.
Not sure what you mean here. Do you mean can we stil use wxMac 2.4? I have no idea; I don't know why the requirement for wxWindows 2.5 exists. I always assumed pgAdmin3 used some feature of wxWindows that required 2.5. If that's not the case, I will happily move back to 2.4. If Unicode support is the only reason to use 2.5, then sure, we can support a non-Unicode Mac version, for know. Whatever the solution, let me know what you decide. Right now I am trying to solve the QB and Mac problems, so that we can have them ready when we release.
Hi Adam,
As far as I am aware it is just the Unicode support that we use 2.5 for. BTW, when I can persuade it to install, I should have a FreeBSD 5.1 box to play with - albeit a pretty slow one!
Regards, Dave