RE: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Тема RE: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows
Дата
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FA58302@G01JPEXMBYT05
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael@paquier.xyz]
> No, I really mean a library dependency failure.  For example, imagine that
> Postgres is compiled on Windows dynamically, and that it depends on
> libxml2.dll, which is itself compiled dynamically.  Then imagine, in a
> custom build echosystem, that a folk comes in and adds lz support to
> libxml2 on Windows.  If Postgres still consumes libxml2 but does not add
> in its PATH a version of lz, then a backend in need of libxml2 would fail
> to load, causing Postgres to not start properly.  True, painful, story.

I see, that's surely painful.  But the DLL in use cannot be overwritten on Windows.  So, I assume the following:

1. postmaster loads libxml2.dll without LZ in folder A.
2. Someone adds libxml2.dll with LZ in folder B.  folder B is ahead of folder A in postgres's PATH.
3. Some user tries to connect to a database, creating a new child postgres process, which fails to load libxml2.dll in
folderB.
 




> What is ticking me is if the popup window stuff discussed on this thread
> could be a problem in the detection of such dependency errors, as with the
> product I am thinking about, Postgres is not running as a service, but kicked
> by another thing which is a service, and monitors the postmaster.

I understood you are talking about a case where some (server) application uses PostgreSQL internally.  That application
runsas a Windows service, but PostgreSQL itself doesn't on its own.  The application starts PostgreSQL by running
pg_ctlstart.
 

In that case, postgres runs under service.  I confirmed it with the following test program.  This code is extracted
frompgwin32_is_service() in PostgreSQL.
 

--------------------------------------------------
#include <windows.h>
#include <stdio.h>

int
main(void)
{
    BOOL        IsMember;
    PSID        ServiceSid;
    PSID        LocalSystemSid;
    SID_IDENTIFIER_AUTHORITY NtAuthority = {SECURITY_NT_AUTHORITY};
    FILE *fp;

    SetErrorMode(0);

    /* Check for service group membership */
    if (!AllocateAndInitializeSid(&NtAuthority, 1,
                                  SECURITY_SERVICE_RID, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                                  &ServiceSid))
    {
        fprintf(stderr, "could not get SID for service group: error code %lu\n",
                GetLastError());
        return 1;
    }

    if (!CheckTokenMembership(NULL, ServiceSid, &IsMember))
    {
        fprintf(stderr, "could not check access token membership: error code %lu\n",
                GetLastError());
        FreeSid(ServiceSid);
        return 1;
    }
    FreeSid(ServiceSid);

    fp = fopen("d:\\a.txt", "a");
    if (IsMember)
        fprintf(fp, "is under service\n");
    else
        fprintf(fp, "is not under service\n");

    return 0;
}
--------------------------------------------------

You can build the above program with:
  cl chksvc.c advapi32.lib


Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Overestimated filter cost and its mitigation