Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql
Дата
Msg-id 10356.1216358359@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql  ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql  ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> Maybe we can use some well defined implicit record, maybe NEW (or
> RESULT, ROW_RESULT, ROW, TABLE_ROW, ...) like trigger - some like

That sounds like exactly the sort of kluge-solution that I didn't
want to get involved with ...

Anyway, the core feature is in, and we still have several months
before 8.4 feature freeze to debate how plpgsql ought to interact
with it.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Pavel Stehule"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql
Следующее
От: "Jonah H. Harris"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving