Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements
Дата
Msg-id 1040162.1623959602@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Phew. Do we really want to break a quite significant number of
> extensions this long after feature freeze? Since we already need to find
> a backpatchable way to deal with the issue it seems like deferring the
> API change to 15 might be prudent?

Uh, nobody ever promised that server-internal APIs are frozen as of beta1;
that would be a horrid crimp on our ability to fix bugs during beta.
I've generally supposed that we don't start expecting that till RC stage.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add version macro to libpq-fe.h
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add version macro to libpq-fe.h