Re: Configurable Penalty Costs for Levenshtein

Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo@ttnet.net.tr> writes:
> I noticed a small typo in the patch.
>   prev = palloc((m + n) * sizeof(char));
> line should look like
>   prev = palloc(2 * m * sizeof(char));
> instead.

If that's wrong, aren't the comments and the length restriction limit
also wrong?

            regards, tom lane