Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue
Дата
Msg-id 10990.1263397358@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I had an idea at one point of making explain show the planned and
> actual # of batches for each hash join.  I believe that "actual # of
> batches > 1" is isomorphic to "hash join went to disk".  The code is
> actually pretty easy; the hard part is figuring out what to do about
> the UI.  The choices seem to be:

> 1. Create a new EXPLAIN option just for this - what would we call it?
> 2. Think of some more, similar things and come up with a new EXPLAIN
> option covering all of them - what else would go along with?
> 3. Sandwhich it into an existing EXPLAIN option, most likely VERBOSE.
> 4. Display it by default.

Treat it the same as the Sort-node actual usage information.  We did not
add a special option when we added that.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue
Следующее
От: Eduardo Piombino
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server