Re: ARC patent

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Neil Conway
Тема Re: ARC patent
Дата
Msg-id 1106092080.22946.172.camel@localhost.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: ARC patent  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: ARC patent
Re: ARC patent
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 18:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I have already
> suggested to core that we should insist on 8.1 not requiring an initdb,
> so as to ensure that people will migrate up to it easily from 8.0.

So is it firm policy that changes that require a catversion update
cannot be made during the 8.1 cycle?

(Needless to say, it would be good to get this sorted out early on in
the 8.1 development cycle, to avoid the need to revert patches at some
point down the line. For those of us working on large projects that will
definitely require an initdb, it would also be good to know -- as this
policy will likely prevent that work from getting into 8.1)

-Neil




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ARC patent