On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 20:12 +0200, Daniel Verite wrote:
> Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> > Hmmm, despite initial euphoria, this doesn't actually work.
>
> Just an idea: make sure DBD::Pg::PG_BYTEA is defined.
> If not, you're just lacking a "use DBD::Pg;" and the result
:) This time it's a hit. Thenx!
Now, this is probably not exactly the furum to discuss that, but:
1. I did quite a few scripts with DBI, not only for Postgesql in fact -
scripts worked flowlessly between Oracle/Sybase and the old DBASE files,
too. And I have never fell into a problem of missing the an include for
a particular driver - simple "use DBI;" did all the magic.
2. I admitt, that I should have spotted myself, that the
DBD::Pg::PG_BYTEA might not have been recognized without the use
clausure, but the driver itself understands prity much of the
underlaying datatypes - I fon't need to bind explicitly for SQL_DATE or
SQL_INTEGER. Why should I care more for binary objects?
So may be the pgtype_bytea should also be recognised? May be current
driver behavior should be regarded as a BUG?
Does anyone know if this behavior is in the driver for a reason?
--
-R