Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:57 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> + * The new member is identified by the zero-based index of the List
>> + * element it should go into, and the bit number to be set therein.
> The comment sounds a bit ambiguous, especially the ", and the bit
> number to be set therein." part. If you meant to describe the
> arguments, how about mentioning their names too, as in:
Done that way in the patch I just posted.
>> + /* forboth will stop at the end of the shorter list, which is fine */
> Isn't this comment unnecessary given that the while loop makes both
> lists be the same length?
No, the while loop ensures that a is at least as long as b.
It could have started out longer, though.
regards, tom lane