Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys

Hi,

On 12/16/22 6:24 PM, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 12/16/22 5:38 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 10:08 AM Drouvot, Bertrand
>> <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> After 1489b1ce728 the name mayConflictInLogicalDecoding seems odd. Seems
>>>> it should be a riff on snapshotConflictHorizon?
>>>
>>> Gotcha, what about logicalSnapshotConflictThreat?
>>
>> logicalConflictPossible? checkDecodingConflict?
>>
>> I think we should try to keep this to three words if we can. There's
>> not likely to be enough value in a fourth word to make up for the
>> downside of being more verbose.
>>
> 
> 
> Yeah agree, I'd vote for logicalConflictPossible then.
> 

Please find attached v33 using logicalConflictPossible as the new field name instead of mayConflictInLogicalDecoding.

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com