Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests
Дата
Msg-id 1180964.1712290543@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests  (Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>)
Ответы Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests  (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name> writes:
> Libedit 20191025-3.1 is the first version where ":{?VERB<tab>" works as
> expected.  The previous release 20190324-3.1 still produces the escaped
> output that Michael found.  That narrows down the changes to everything
> between [1] (changed on 2019-03-24 but not included in 20190324-3.1) and
> [2] (both inclusive).

Hm.  I just installed NetBSD 8.2 in a VM, and it passes this test:

# +++ tap install-check in src/bin/psql +++
t/001_basic.pl ........... ok     
t/010_tab_completion.pl .. ok    
t/020_cancel.pl .......... ok   
All tests successful.

So it seems like the bug does not exist in any currently-supported
NetBSD release.  Debian has been known to ship obsolete libedit
versions, though.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Streaming read-ready sequential scan code
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Statistics Import and Export