Re: varchar(n) VS text

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kev
Тема Re: varchar(n) VS text
Дата
Msg-id 1182857768.298640.272710@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: varchar(n) VS text  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: varchar(n) VS text  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
On Jun 26, 12:16 am, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) wrote:
> "Pierre Thibaudeau" <pierd...@gmail.com> writes:
> > I am puzzling over this issue:
> > 1) Is there ever ANY reason to prefer "varchar(n)" to "text" as a column type?
>
> In words of one syllable: no.

If you have any input from untrusted sources (like in a web app)
wouldn't it be easier to attack the server if you had a text field,
like by sending a couple TB of data over that pgsql then needs to
store, on a server that doesn't have that amount of space?

Er...I guess the web server would then be the cap?  Or whatever other
tiers you had between the client and pgsql?

Kev


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Sergei Shelukhin
Дата:
Сообщение: what's wrong with this conf file?
Следующее
От: "Gurjeet Singh"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: a JOIN on same table, but 'slided over'