Re: HOT pgbench results

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: HOT pgbench results
Дата
Msg-id 1186514137.4192.49.camel@ebony.site
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на HOT pgbench results  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: HOT pgbench results  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:16 +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I ran some CPU intensive pgbench tests on HOT. Results are not
> surprising, HOT makes practically no difference on the total transaction
> rate, but reduces the need to vacuum:
> 
>         unpatched    HOT    
> tps        3680        3790
> WAL written(MB)    5386        4804
> checkpoints    10        9
> autovacuums    116        43
> autoanalyzes    139        60

Nor would I expect anything else, on this test.

The pgbench database has 4 tables, of which 3 have one index and 1 has
no indexes at all. 

A table without indexes is uncommon and most major entities such as
accounts have 2-3 indexes if not more. So I would be inclined to add a
PK to HISTORY and add two additional indexes to ACCOUNTS and then repeat
the test to see what difference it makes.

--  Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB  http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Cantor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Internal Postgre SQL documentation
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: HOT patch, missing things