Column as arrays.. more efficient than columns?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ow Mun Heng
Тема Column as arrays.. more efficient than columns?
Дата
Msg-id 1189052571.17792.51.camel@neuromancer.home.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Column as arrays.. more efficient than columns?  (Ow Mun Heng <Ow.Mun.Heng@wdc.com>)
Re: Column as arrays.. more efficient than columns?  ("Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Table is like

create table foo (
number int,
subset int,
value  int
)

select * from foo;
number | subset | value
1        1        1
1        2        2
1        3        10
1        4        3

current query is like

select number,
avg(case when subset = 1 then value else null end) as v1,
avg(case when subset = 2 then value else null end) as v2,
avg(case when subset = 3 then value else null end) as v3,
avg(case when subset = 4 then value else null end) as v4
from foo
group by number

results
------
number | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4
1         1   2    10   4


I'm thinking of denormalising it a bit and put it either as an array or
just create a new table with the end result like the above.

I just want to know which is more efficient. Users can just do a

select * from new_foo where number = 'X';


Thanks.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ow Mun Heng
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Max File size per Table (1G limit??)
Следующее
От: Együd Csaba
Дата:
Сообщение: Getting sequence name for a non-serial column