AW: AW: AW: AW: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function lang uage nam esh

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Тема AW: AW: AW: AW: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function lang uage nam esh
Дата
Msg-id 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA687963368122@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-hackers
> Also, the grammar clause "LANGUAGE C" is actually part of the standard, so
> naming it "LANGUAGE stdC" will make it *less* standard.  (Not that I buy
> Informix as being a "standard".)

I only quoted Informix, because it is the only one where I know how it works.
It might even be, that the Oracle and DB/2 interface is also similar to our "oldC",
I simply don't know.

The fact, that part of this is already in the standard (like "language c") makes me 
even more firm in my opinion, that more research is needed before advertising "newC".

Andreas


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Дата:
Сообщение: AW: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c)
Следующее
От: Philip Warner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: AW: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh