On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 15:06 +0300, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> Done. Now GIN counts number of pending tuples and pages and stores they on
> metapage. Index cleanup could start during normal insertion in two cases:
> - number of pending tuples is too high to keep guaranteed non-lossy tidbitmap
> - pending page's content doesn't fit into work_mem.
Great, thanks. I will take a look at this version tonight.
Because time is short, I will mark it as "Ready for committer review"
now. I think all of the major issues have been addressed, and I'll just
be looking at the code and testing it.
> BTW, gincostestimate could use that information for cost estimation, but is
> index opening and metapge reading in amcostestimate acceptable?
That sounds reasonable to me. I think that's what the index-specific
cost estimators are for. Do you expect a performance impact?
Regards,Jeff Davis