On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 15:50 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > It seems to me that the best method would be to follow the
> > information_schema naming conventions as information_schema is standard
> > compliant (right?).
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
>
>
> What would be the benefit? Apart from satisfying a passion for consistency?
It would lower the cost (intellectually as well as dollars) of
development and administration for every single user of the database.
I can't count how many times I accidentally type tablename versus
table_name or worse relname, etc...
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 -
http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997