Re: operator exclusion constraints

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: operator exclusion constraints
Дата
Msg-id 1259887326.5880.34.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: operator exclusion constraints  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: operator exclusion constraints  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 19:00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm starting to go through this patch now.  I thought the consensus
> was to refer to them as just "exclusion constraints"?  I'm not seeing
> that the word "operator" really adds anything.

I assume you're referring to the name used in documentation and error
messages. I didn't see a clear consensus, but the relevant thread is
here:

http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1258227283.708.108.camel@jdavis

"Exclusion Constraints" is fine with me, as are the other options listed
in that email.

Regards,Jeff Davis

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgbench: new feature allowing to launch shell commands
Следующее
От: "David E. Wheeler"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: First feature patch for plperl - draft [PATCH]