On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 03:28 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > The backup history file is a slightly bit quirky way of doing things and
> > was designed when the transfer mechanism was file-based.
> >
> > Why don't we just write a new xlog record that contains the information
> > we need? Copy the contents of the backup history file into the WAL
> > record, just like we do with prepared transactions. That way it will be
> > streamed to the standby without any other code being needed for SR,
> > while we don't need to retest warm standby to check that still works
> > also.
>
> This means that we can replace a backup history file with the corresponding
> xlog record. I think that we should simplify the code by making the replacement
> completely rather than just adding new xlog record. Thought?
We can't do that because it would stop file-based archiving from
working. I don't think we should deprecate that for another release at
least.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com