On mån, 2010-03-08 at 11:26 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> It's definitely something we *should* have, so unless you have
> something that works fine, applying a solution that does it on the
> website would be a good thing - since it'll check both the
> documentation and all our other things as well...
After a bit of browsing around, I found the tool webcheck
(http://arthurdejong.org/webcheck/). I just ran it over the
documentation and fixed a number of problems. Perhaps it can be useful
for the website as well.