Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Дата
Msg-id 1273142915.12659.178.camel@ebony
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful  (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>)
Ответы Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful  (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>)
Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 11:36 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:

> If there was an additional SQL-callable function that returned the backends the recovery process is currently waiting
for,plus one that reported that last timestamp seen in the WAL, than all those different cancellation policies could be
implementedas daemons that monitor recovery and kill backends as needed, no?
 
> 
> That would allow people to experiment with different cancellation policies, and maybe shed some light on what the
usefulpolicies are in practice.
 

It would be easier to implement a conflict resolution plugin that is
called when a conflict occurs, allowing users to have a customisable
mechanism. Again, I have no objection to that proposal.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jaime Casanova
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs
Следующее
От: Florian Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful