On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 10:23 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 09:22:56AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 09:08 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> >
> > > > Come on people, good lord.
> > >
> > > No, *you* come on.
> > >
> > > This company has a long, consistent, and bad track record as far as
> > > unsolicited contacts for commercial stuff, i.e. spam. Unless we're
> > > going to turn our lists over to spammers, that track record needs to
> > > have real, serious consequences.
> >
> > No. You are jumping a cliff here.
>
> Nope. So far, you're the only person in this discussion who appears
> to think they should get a free pass. All others range from "ban
> immediately" to "see whether they misbehave yet again."
Interesting how you completely ignored the fact at hand. They have no
offense against .Org. Just specific (and very few) individuals who
happen to contribute to .Org.
.Org is not the weight behind your SPAM complaints. You will need a
different bully against that foe.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers,
> David.
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt