On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 14:26 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> > All I'm saying is that if we end up shipping without that
> > parameter (implying allow_standalone_primary=on), we need to call
> > the feature something else. The GUCs and code can probably stay as
> > it is, but we shouldn't use the term "synchronous replication" in
> > the documentation, and release notes and such.
>
> I think including "synchronous" is OK as long as it's properly
> qualified. Off-hand thoughts in no particular order:
>
> semi-synchronous
You mean asynchronous
> conditionally synchronous
You mean asynchronous
JD
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt