Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David E. Wheeler
Тема Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap?
Дата
Msg-id 12E14B60-2C7C-4CB2-9ECE-449F6D866D50@justatheory.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap?  (Chapman Flack <jcflack@acm.org>)
Ответы Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap?
Список pgsql-hackers

> On Jun 14, 2024, at 11:25, Chapman Flack <jcflack@acm.org> wrote:
>
> I would s/extepsions/exceptions/ in the added documentation. :)

Bah, fixed and attached, thanks.

> Offhand (as GitHub PRs aren't really The PG Way), if they were The Way,
> I would find this one a little hard to follow, being based at a point
> 28 unrelated commits ahead of the ref it's opened against. I suspect
> 'master' on theory/postgres could be fast-forwarded to f1affb6 and then
> the PR would look much more approachable.

Yeah, I pushed the PR and branch before I synced master, and GitHub was taking a while to notice and update the PR. I
fixedit with `git commit --all --amend --date now --reedit-message HEAD` and force-pushed (then fixed the typo and
fixedagain). 

D




Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: libpq contention due to gss even when not using gss
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RFC: adding pytest as a supported test framework