Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On 8 April 2013 15:29, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Just for the record, the right way to handle that kind of change is to
>> change XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC, not catversion. A database's catalog version
>> might not be available to code that is inspecting WAL files and would
>> like to know what format it should expect.
> I was so happy Andres had remembered to bump the catversion like I often
> do, it didn't occur to me it was the wrong one. My bad, sorry.
No problem. XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC is already different from what it was in
9.2, so it's mostly academic whether or not we bump it again during
the devel cycle.
regards, tom lane