Re: Playing with set returning functions in SELECT list - behaviour intended?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Playing with set returning functions in SELECT list - behaviour intended?
Дата
Msg-id 13656.1245161214@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Playing with set returning functions in SELECT list - behaviour intended?  ("Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Ответы Re: Playing with set returning functions in SELECT list - behaviour intended?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Список pgsql-general
"Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> writes:
> So it looks like the number of result rows is the least common multiple
> of the cardinalities of all columns in the select list.

It's always been that way.  The lack of any obviously-sane way to
handle multiple SRFs in a targetlist is exactly why the feature is
looked on with disfavor.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Trigger Function and backup
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_relation_size, relation does not exist