Re: Back-patch change in hashed DISTINCT estimation?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: Back-patch change in hashed DISTINCT estimation?
Дата
Msg-id 1377096247.99524.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Back-patch change in hashed DISTINCT estimation?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:

> Yeah, I've been thinking about this a bit also and agree that 9.3
> is fine but not farther back.

+1 to 9.3 but no farther back.

I would be in favor of going farther back if there were not fairly
obvious workarounds for the OOM problems that lack of back-patch
could cause.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "MauMau"
Дата:
Сообщение: [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review])