Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Zhang Mingli
Тема Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache
Дата
Msg-id 13e3e68a-8266-402e-93c2-5e126c40cc74@Spark
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache  (Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache  (Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Sep 28, 2022, 22:41 +0800, Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com>, wrote:


Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres@gmail.com>, 28 Eyl 2022 Çar, 17:31 tarihinde şunu yazdı:
Why compute usagecount_avg twice? 

I should have removed the first one, but I think I missed it.
Nice catch.

Attached an updated version.

Thanks,
Melih

Hmm, I just apply v13 patch but failed.

Part of errors:
```
error: patch failed: contrib/pg_buffercache/pg_buffercache.control:1 error: contrib/pg_buffercache/pg_buffercache.control: patch does not apply
Checking patch contrib/pg_buffercache/pg_buffercache_pages.c...
error: while searching for:
 */
PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(pg_buffercache_pages);
PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(pg_buffercache_pages_v1_4);
```

Rebase on master and then apply our changes again?

Regards,
Zhang Mingli

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: DROP OWNED BY is broken on master branch.
Следующее
От: Kaiting Chen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Allow foreign keys to reference a superset of unique columns