Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm ... that's interesting, why does that work? My guess is that the
>> CommandCounterIncrement() after the CREATE TABLE causes the SI code
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> It's called in the case of
> create table bug1 (f1 int28 primary key);
> too (after CREATE TABLE and before CREATE INDEX)...
Yeah, I know --- that's why I'm confused about why the one case works
and the other doesn't...
regards, tom lane