Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mark Anns
Тема Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?
Дата
Msg-id 1479377371828-5930783.post@n3.nabble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?  (Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
Ответы Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?  (Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Can u explain this statement "check whether the scan qualifier can
be executable on GPU device"

What are the scan qualifiers?

How to determine whether they are device executable or not?

The cost estimates are entirely based on number of rows and type of scan.
Then it will be same for both CPU and GPU. How the decision can be made for
cheaper one comparing CPU and GPU estimates?




--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/How-the-Planner-in-PGStrom-differs-from-PostgreSQL-tp5929724p5930783.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Anns
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?
Следующее
От: Andy Halsall
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: libpq backwards compatbility