Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication and inheritance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication and inheritance
Дата
Msg-id 147f29e5-09a4-2277-e056-0b3611784b46@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Logical replication and inheritance  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication and inheritance  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2/27/17 01:57, Amit Langote wrote:
> I see that if the table is a inheritance parent, and ONLY is not
> specified, the child tables are also added to the publication.

> If the child table is later removed from the inheritance hierarchy, it
> continues to be a part of the publication.

> Perhaps that's intentional?

I came across this the other day as well.  It's not clear what the best
way for this to behave would be.  Another option would be to check the
then-current inheritance relationships in the output plugin.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] patch: function xmltable
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] check failure with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE -DCLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY