Re: Bitmap Heap scan 8.1/8.2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: Bitmap Heap scan 8.1/8.2
Дата
Msg-id 162867790710230532m1504601fha41a933de97ffdad@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bitmap Heap scan 8.1/8.2  (Martin Marques <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar>)
Список pgsql-general
2007/10/23, Martin Marques <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar>:
> Martin Marques escribió:
> > Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >>
> >> try
> >>
> >> set work_mem to '8MB';
> >> and
> >> explain analyze select ..
> >
> > These things didn't help. What changed the plan completely was this:
> >
> > seq_page_cost = 5.0                     # measured on an arbitrary scale
> > cpu_tuple_cost = 0.05                   # same scale as above
>
> Can someone explain how this parameters are measured? What is 5.0 in
> this case for seq_page_cost?
>

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/runtime-config-query.html

5.0 means so seq scan will be expensive for optimaliser, and
optimaliser will prefer index scan.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Nis Jørgensen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SQL spec/implementation question: UPDATE
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reliability of WAL replication