2009/10/2 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> My inclination is to think that the right behavior for REPLACE FUNCTION
>> is to keep the old proowner and proacl values, because that's what it
>> always has done and nobody's complained.
>
> +1.
+1
Pavel
>
> Stephen
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkrGMm4ACgkQrzgMPqB3kiiA5wCgis9FDnbm3wQ2cktKDxOK2hjL
> ZqQAnRHl3rnXTki4WUBcS+iiZRWuzvSU
> =Uq6m
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>