On 2020/02/18 16:53, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 4:42 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>> On 2020/02/18 16:02, Amit Langote wrote:
>>> I noticed that there is missing </para> tag in the documentation changes:
>>
>> Could you tell me where I should add </para> tag?
>>
>>> + <row>
>>> + <entry><literal>waiting for checkpoint to finish</literal></entry>
>>> + <entry>
>>> + The WAL sender process is currently performing
>>> + <function>pg_start_backup</function> to set up for
>>> + taking a base backup, and waiting for backup start
>>> + checkpoint to finish.
>>> + </entry>
>>> + <row>
>>>
>>> There should be a </row> between </entry> and <row> at the end of the
>>> hunk shown above.
>>
>> Will fix. Thanks!
>
> Just to clarify, that's the missing </para> tag I am talking about above.
OK, so I added </row> tag just after the above </entry>.
>>> + <para>
>>> + Whenever <application>pg_basebackup</application> is taking a base
>>> + backup, the <structname>pg_stat_progress_basebackup</structname>
>>> + view will contain a row for each WAL sender process that is currently
>>> + running <command>BASE_BACKUP</command> replication command
>>> + and streaming the backup.
>>>
>>> I understand that you wrote "Whenever pg_basebackup is taking a
>>> backup...", because description of other views contains a similar
>>> starting line. But, it may not only be pg_basebackup that would be
>>> served by this view, no? It could be any tool that speaks Postgres'
>>> replication protocol and thus be able to send a BASE_BACKUP command.
>>> If that is correct, I would write something like "When an application
>>> is taking a backup" or some such without specific reference to
>>> pg_basebackup. Thoughts?
>>
>> Yeah, there may be some such applications. But most users would
>> use pg_basebackup, so getting rid of the reference to pg_basebackup
>> would make the description a bit difficult-to-read. Also I can imagine
>> that an user of those backup applications would get to know
>> the progress reporting view from their documents. So I prefer
>> the existing one or something like "Whenever an application like
>> pg_basebackup ...". Thought?
>
> Sure, "an application like pg_basebackup" sounds fine to me.
OK, I changed the doc that way. Attached the updated version of the patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters