Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors
Дата
Msg-id 17297.1586809346@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2020-04-11 10:54:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I guess you could make them PANICs, but it would be an option that nobody
>> could possibly want to have enabled in anything resembling production.
>> So I"m kind of -0.5 on making --enable-cassert do it automatically.
>> Although I suppose that it's not really worse than other assertion
>> failures.

> I'd much rather see this throw an assertion than the current
> behaviour. But I'm wondering if there's a chance we can throw an error
> in non-assert builds without adding too much complexity to the error
> paths. Could we perhaps throw the error a bit later during the commit
> processing?

Any error post-commit is a semantic disaster.

I guess that an assertion wouldn't be so awful, if people would rather
do it like that in debug builds.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?