"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Jan 27, 2010, at 4:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Sure. Which is why I'm resisting expanding our exposure to it
> I don't understand how it's expanding core's exposure to it.
[ shrug...] I see little point in repeating myself yet again.
It's obvious that the people who want this are entirely willing
to adopt a Pollyanna-ishly optimistic view about its potential
to cause serious problems that we may or may not be able to fix.
I don't really expect to be able to prevent something along this line
from getting committed --- I'm merely hoping to circumscribe it as much
as possible and get large WARNING items into the manual's description.
regards, tom lane