Nikhil Sontakke <nikkhils@gmail.com> writes:
> Consider:
> SELECT xml '<foo>bar</foo><bar>foo</bar>' IS DOCUMENT;
> And I was looking at xml_is_document() source code. It calls xml_parse
> which throws an error with code set to ERRCODE_INVALID_XML_DOCUMENT. The
> catch block of xml_parse then rethrows.
> Now xml_is_document does a selective rethrow only if the error is not
> ERRCODE_INVALID_XML_DOCUMENT. I can understand that this function does this
> to return true/false, but doesn't this behavior of not propagating the
> error up all the way dangerous? InterruptHoldoffCount inconsistencies for
> instance?
No, I don't see any particular risk there. The places that might throw
ERRCODE_INVALID_XML_DOCUMENT are sufficiently few (as in, exactly one,
in this usage) that we can have reasonable confidence we know what the
system state is when we catch that error.
> A better way would have been to modify xml_parse to take an additional
> boolean argument "to_rethrow" and not to rethrow if that is false?
We could do that, but it would greatly complicate xml_parse IMO, since
it still needs its own PG_TRY block to handle other error cases, and
only one of those error cases ought to optionally return failure instead
of re-throwing.
regards, tom lane