Manuel Sugawara <masm@fciencias.unam.mx> writes:
> (Some time ago I proposed an--incomplete--patch and it was rejectd by
> Karel arguing that to_char functions should behave *exactly* the same
> way that they do in Oracle.)
That is the accepted plan for to_char ... of course, if Oracle changes
to_char every so often, it'll get more interesting to decide what to do.
regards, tom lane