I second Alvaro: Why is that?
-tfo
On Sep 9, 2004, at 6:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 09:31:09AM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
>> Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
>>> There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in the
>>> 7.4.x
>>> docs:
>>
>> Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't
>> bother
>> applying documentation fixes to release branches, even if there were
>> plans for another 7.4.x release.
>
> Oh, is this really a good policy?