Re: Small changes to facilitate Win32 port

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> writes:
> Question to all: Any objection to postfix? If so, why?

Well, I suggested DTF_FOO by analogy to the DTK_FOO name set that appears
elsewhere in that same header.  If you want to rename those to FOO_DTK
in parallel, I have no objection.

> IGNORE_TOK - How about "IGNORE_DTF" or "IGNORE_D"? Let's make it a bit
> specific to date/time stuff.

Agreed.  That thought was what motivated me to gripe in the first place.
        regards, tom lane