Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL?
Дата
Msg-id 19518.1319057158@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL?  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL?  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL?  (Valentine Gogichashvili <valgog@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> The point being, how do I convert any query to a non WITH variant so
> it can be PERFORM'd?  Anyways, I always thought having to do perform
> at all was pretty weak sauce -- not sure why it's required.

Possibly it was an Oracle compatibility thing ... anyone know PL/SQL
well enough to say how this works there?

I suppose you could argue that selecting a value and implicitly throwing
it away is confusing to novices, but on the other hand I've seen a whole
lot of novices confused by the need to write PERFORM instead of SELECT.
I think it wouldn't be an unreasonable thing to just interpret a SELECT
with no INTO clause as being a PERFORM (ie execute and discard results).
Then we'd not have to do anything magic for commands starting with WITH.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: incompatible pointer type
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL?