Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn()
Дата
Msg-id 19936.1494513937@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn()  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 01:09:36PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 05/10/2017 12:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Hm, well, anybody else want to vote?

>>> +1 for #2

>> Same, +1 for #2 (apply this patch)

> #1, do nothing.

OK, by my count we have

For patch:
Joe Conway
Stephen Frost
Kyotaro Horiguchi (*)
Petr Jelinek (*)
Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian
David Rowley
David Steele
Euler Taveira

For doing nothing:
Peter Eisentraut
Robert Haas
Michael Paquier

I think Kyotaro-san and Petr would have preferred standardizing
on "location" over "lsn", but they were definitely not for doing
nothing.  With or without their votes, it's pretty clear that the
ayes have it.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stas Kelvich
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn()