Vadim Mikheev said:
>
> Brandon Ibach wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm... well, the table may be 57 Meg, but then, the backend
> > running the vacuum has consumed 5 1/2 hours of CPU time so far, and
> > still going strong, so something tells me there may be something
> > deeper. :)
>
> Did you have any indices for this table ?
>
> Vadim
>
Nope... no indices at all.
-Brandon :)