On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'm still not really eager to introduce yet another category of
> keywords, but perhaps it is worth doing. Comments?
If we consider that they can now be a problem in pl/pgsql, it might be
a good idea to consider it for this release.
(I'm thinking of
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/17728.1261002579@sss.pgh.pa.us
for instance)
--
Guillaume